GEO for Tongyi Qianwen
The one that is best at product questions.
Tongyi Qianwen handles product-shaped questions noticeably better than general-purpose questions — specifications, comparisons, what fits which use case. Brands that sell a product with attributes get more out of this platform than brands that sell an undifferentiated service.
The practical consequence is that structured product information matters more here than elsewhere. Attributes that are written as plain prose often do not survive; the same attributes in a table or in structured data usually do.
What Tongyi Qianwen rewards
Observed by running the same question set across every platform we cover and recording what the answers cite.
Where Tongyi Qianwen tends to take material from
Check this before commissioning content: material placed where a platform does not look will not reach its answers, however good it is.
Structured product data
Schema.org Product markup, spec tables, clear attribute naming.
Comparison and buying-guide content
Content that states when something is not the right fit is used more than pure promotion.
B2B and supplier platforms
For industrial and wholesale categories these carry a lot of the answer.
Four moves that work on Tongyi Qianwen
Ordered by cost. The first one is usually free and usually the one that moves the number.
Questions teams ask before they start
We sell services, not products. Does this platform matter?
Less than for product brands, but it still handles "which provider" questions. The same principle applies: express the service as attributes that can be compared — coverage, delivery method, reporting cadence, what is included — rather than as prose about capability.
What is the minimum structured data to add?
Product markup covering the attributes already visible on the page, with consistent attribute naming across the catalogue. Marking up attributes that do not appear on the page is a violation rather than an optimisation.
Our specs are in images. Does that work?
No. Attributes inside images are not retrievable. Reproduce the same specifications as a text table on the page; keep the image if it serves buyers, but it cannot be the only place the facts exist.
How should service businesses present attributes?
As comparable fields rather than a capability description: coverage, delivery method, reporting cadence, what is included, what is billed separately. A comparison engine can use those; a paragraph about experience it cannot.
Does a price have to be published?
Not necessarily. A stated range with its conditions is usable; an absent price is neutral; a price that contradicts other channels is damaging. Consistency across channels matters more than disclosure.
How do we stop one product reading as three?
Use one canonical product name across every channel and list alternate names as explicit aliases on the product page. Naming drift between the site, marketplaces and documentation is the usual cause of a split entity.
Compare it with the others
Find out where your brand actually stands in AI answers.
An AI visibility diagnosis across the platforms your customers use, on your real questions. No charge for the first look.